RM TOWER 311

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRM TOWER 311  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181024
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateApr 25 '23 at 03:43
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$125
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 165
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 393
43% 338 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.1% Above average
Lighting 73.9
Reflection 75.3
Parallax 77
60% 75.4 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 0.3
33% 46.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900BB3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 32 288 33 152 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 372
Write 231
Mixed 352
SusWrite 154
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 29.2
102% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 200
170% 246 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 91%
Hitachi HUS724030ALA640 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MF8OAC50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 162 162 159 159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 164
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 160
101% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF ACR16D3LU1KFG/8G 99U5403-160.A00LF Hynix HMT41GU7AFR8C-PB 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TOWER 311 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: RM TOWER 311

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $184
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback