QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics8.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230404
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateApr 25 '23 at 02:27
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 61.7
1-Core 184
2-Core 366
104% 204 Pts
4-Core 730
8-Core 1,332
124% 1,031 Pts
64-Core 2,101
130% 2,101 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
8.23% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 14.4
Parallax 10.4
8% 11.4 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 10.4
9% 11.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.23%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 34GB
16GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,062
Write 4,503
Mixed 5,339
1,248% 5,634 MB/s
4K Read 292
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 248
878% 254 MB/s
DQ Read 2,001
DQ Write 1,648
DQ Mixed 1,838
1,373% 1,829 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 65%
Red Hat VirtIO 54GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,321
Write 4,664
Mixed 5,476
4,375% 5,820 MB/s
4K Read 296
4K Write 230
4K Mixed 255
44,917% 260 MB/s
DQ Read 2,032
DQ Write 1,449
DQ Mixed 1,832
16,531% 1,771 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 106%
Red Hat VirtIO 17GB
14GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 7,250
Write 4,829
Mixed 5,527
4,411% 5,869 MB/s
4K Read 302
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 258
45,538% 263 MB/s
DQ Read 1,998
DQ Write 1,617
DQ Mixed 1,859
16,895% 1,824 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
77.8% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 28.2
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 22.5
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback