Oemze Product

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardOemze Product  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2400 x 1600 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210518
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateApr 25 '23 at 00:20
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 53.6
1-Core 131
2-Core 214
72% 133 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 595
62% 497 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Microsoft(1414 0054) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2647
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.7% Above average
Lighting 72.6
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 62
59% 67.5 fps
MRender 62.3
Gravity 55.5
Splatting 52.8
46% 56.9 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GD3GX013N 510GB
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41001C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 961 664 652 718 764 765 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
250% Outstanding
Read 2,275
Write 1,950
Mixed 1532
SusWrite 754
364% 1,628 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 72.3
235% 82 MB/s
DQ Read 988
DQ Write 798
DQ Mixed 934
688% 907 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 250%
Great: 327%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 60.2
MC Mixed 40.7
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 13.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 115%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Product Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Oemze Product

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback