MSI MS-17E3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star WE75 9TJ
MotherboardMSI MS-17E3  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '23 at 22:48
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 228
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 494
57% 446 Pts
64-Core 681
42% 681 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro T2000
MSI(1462 1294) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3141
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.3% Average
Lighting 61.2
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 53.3
50% 59.3 fps
MRender 42.1
Gravity 52.6
Splatting 56.9
42% 50.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1142 307 309 312 307 308 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 2,144
Write 1,582
Mixed 1220
SusWrite 448
300% 1,348 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 61.4
201% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 763
DQ Write 493
DQ Mixed 637
473% 631 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 204%
Great: 249%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
916GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 161 161 159 157 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 174
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 160
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
242% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 93%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 21.7
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17E3 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI MS-17E3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback