HP EliteDesk 705 G2 MINI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G2 MINI  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 805B
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201020
Uptime3 Days
Run DateApr 24 '23 at 17:52
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A8-8600B R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
U4500, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Memory 36.3
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 87.8
34% 58.6 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 134
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
HP(103C 805B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
5.08% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 8.3
5% 7.23 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 7
Splatting 7
6% 6.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.08%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 2.5 7MM 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4130012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 169 176 179 181 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 295
Write 226
Mixed 224
SusWrite 184
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 17
56% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 186
141% 191 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Kingston KN2M64-ETB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 11.1
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 5.8
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 26%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G2 MINI Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G2 MINI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback