Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

13 months ago, 13 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4210M 15,981 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Memory 17.5 1-Core 72.4 2-Core 104 34% 64.7 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 179 18% 144 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 220E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.49% Terrible	Lighting 3.2 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 4.4 3% 3 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 2 Splatting 3.8 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.49% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BF180A5L 180GB 1,596 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: LTVi SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 115 126 112 123 135 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.7% Average	Read 240 Write 182 Mixed 150 SusWrite 123 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 20.8 62% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 239 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 120 111% 174 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5674QH0-YK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 10GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.13 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 340 12% 340 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-4210MIntelBench 51%, 15,981 samples	3x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	3x

SSD
SSDSC2BF180A5L 180GBIntelBench 65%, 1,596 samples	2x
EYOTA-512GB 512GBBench 70%, 99 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5674QH0-YK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 10GBSamsungBench 32%, 23 samples	2x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,257 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16