Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210803
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 24 '23 at 13:12
Run Duration324 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 242
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 589
64% 506 Pts
64-Core 609
38% 609 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Lighting 94.1
Reflection 88.5
Parallax 77.2
77% 86.6 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 77.9
Splatting 71.3
59% 71.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
687GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 711250WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2412 2480 968 1072 398 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 1,186
Write 2,565
Mixed 1,914
SusWrite 1,250
394% 1,728 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 80.9
295% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,133
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 1,073
784% 1,028 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 259%
Great: 333%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
8GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,098
Write 4,323
Mixed 4,266
1,016% 4,562 MB/s
4K Read 599
4K Write 351
4K Mixed 413
1,623% 454 MB/s
DQ Read 1,620
DQ Write 1,172
DQ Mixed 1,295
995% 1,362 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
357GB free
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 468 464 450 449 451 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 394
Write 472
Mixed 388
SusWrite 458
97% 428 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 61.5
205% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 160
179% 304 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 124%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
44GB free
Firmware: SBC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 86 85 86 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 48.3
Write 48.4
Mixed 54
SusWrite 86
44% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.1
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 161 162 158 158 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 127
Write 140
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 158
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.8
243% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 88%
I-O DATA HDEL-UT 3TB
125GB free, PID 0160
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 168 161 166 166 167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 150
Write 142
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 166
160% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 67%
BUFFALO HD-EDS-A 3TB
262GB free, PID 02cc
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 99 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 99.5
Write 105
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 98.2
133% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 80%
BUFFALO External HDD 2TB
39GB free, PID 0286
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 211 210 140 134 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 209
Write 164
Mixed 84.3
SusWrite 174
204% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 76%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
82GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 100 100 99 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 142
Write 136
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 101
127% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 53%
BUFFALO HD-PCFU3 500GB
87GB free, PID 0290
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 65 63 56 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 61.9
97% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 37%
I-O DATA HDPC-U 750GB
44GB free, PID 0135
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 33 33 33 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 54.2
Write 30.8
Mixed 26.9
SusWrite 32.1
45% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
48% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGU88C-26N190A 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 35.3
90% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 34
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 4,664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0 - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $418
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback