HP Desktop M01-F0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemHP Desktop M01-F0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8643
Memory5.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210329
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 23 '23 at 21:34
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 62.6
1-Core 98
2-Core 240
70% 133 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 576
58% 470 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
HP(103C 8643) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.44.23
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 29.6
16% 21.4 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 26.2
Splatting 15.4
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fikwot FN500 512GB
445GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0721A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1111 1140 1137 1169 1172 1170 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,365
Write 1,177
Mixed 984
SusWrite 1,150
263% 1,169 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 30.5
184% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 799
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 482
440% 674 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 212%
Great: 266%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 18.7
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop M01-F0xxx Builds (Compare 617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop M01-F0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback