HP ProBook 470 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProBook 470 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8102
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220927
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 23 '23 at 19:21
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GIB-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 77.9
2-Core 138
57% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 205
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8102) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 5.9
4% 6.87 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 8.8
6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN6S-256G-1006 256GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 229 246 245 243 241 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
62% Good
Read 388
Write 274
Mixed 198
SusWrite 238
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 22.7
75% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 53.5
DQ Mixed 111
102% 165 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62%
Great: 92%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$75
133GB free
Firmware: M0CR011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 300 289 272 315 313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 358
Write 281
Mixed 254
SusWrite 296
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 21.7
67% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 56.2
DQ Mixed 106
102% 168 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBD1 Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.8% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 23.3
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 19.8
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 470 G3 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 470 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback