Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '23 at 15:28
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 204
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 594
60% 485 Pts
64-Core 787
49% 787 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2386) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 139
Parallax 171
111% 149 fps
MRender 170
Gravity 156
Splatting 136
124% 154 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 112%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 396
Write 179
Mixed 244
60% 273 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 9
52% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 71.2
DQ Mixed 38.6
44% 75.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 55%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
95GB free
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 256 256 254 255 258 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 442
Mixed 340
SusWrite 260
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 34.6
131% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 253
213% 311 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FBD2 BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FD2 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 31.5
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 21.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback