Asus B360M-PIXIU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B360M-PIXIU  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180319
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateApr 23 '23 at 04:29
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 232
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 640
70% 552 Pts
64-Core 631
39% 631 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.68
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.1% Poor
Lighting 35.4
Reflection 46.5
Parallax 37.3
29% 39.7 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 0.1
18% 24.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 8.1 7.3 3.6 98 414 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 484
Write 432
Mixed 390
SusWrite 89.2
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 23.1
108% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 0.2
69% 162 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
163GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 121 116 109 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 156
Write 148
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 116
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2666 C19 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 11.9
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.7
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M-PIXIU Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B360M-PIXIU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback