Biostar H510MHP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar H510MHP  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 22 '23 at 22:33
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 641
65% 527 Pts
64-Core 796
49% 796 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1363) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.9% Average
Lighting 54.4
Reflection 58.3
Parallax 52.9
44% 55.2 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 46.6
43% 53.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TGT EGON T2 240GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 403 402 426 283 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 450
Write 439
Mixed 362
SusWrite 333
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 11.9
106% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 16.5
74% 163 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DANTALION 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.7% Average
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 11.7
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510MHP Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Biostar H510MHP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback