Biostar H510MH/E 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar H510MH/E 2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 22 '23 at 19:30
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$116
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 76.5
1-Core 151
2-Core 301
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 895
88% 722 Pts
64-Core 1,078
67% 1,078 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Nvidia(10DE 13A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 124
Parallax 128
116% 131 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 111
Splatting 100
104% 131 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 109%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 383 139 193 136 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 358
Write 382
Mixed 309
SusWrite 213
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 32.7
128% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 164
135% 187 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 81%
Jmicron Tech 320GB
275GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 38 38 40 39 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 51.4
Write 32.2
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 37.5
28% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 51%
Mass Storage Device 960GB
489GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 33 32 32 31 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 54.2
Write 28.1
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 31.7
45% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 8.9
512% 10.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 32%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 17
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510MH/E 2.0 Builds (Compare 573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Biostar H510MH/E 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $381
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback