LG A50PV.AJ2114

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG A50PV.AJ2114  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR MS-7717
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110706
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 22 '23 at 15:33
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 152
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 259
35% 262 Pts
64-Core 253
16% 253 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Zotac(19DA 1281) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 30.3
18% 26.2 fps
MRender 32.9
Gravity 28.1
Splatting 24.7
23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNS Series mSATA PCI-E 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TA5ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 119 126 139 125 133 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49% Average
Read 180
Write 181
Mixed 175
SusWrite 128
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 30.4
101% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 76.9
DQ Mixed 38.6
34% 48.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49%
Great: 89%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
224GB free
Firmware: AM0P1D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 93 100 101 101 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 80.2
Write 79.5
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 96.6
52% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 12.4
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A50PV.AJ2114 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: LG A50PV.AJ2114

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback