Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1900 x 1068 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190508
Uptime6 Days
Run DateApr 22 '23 at 14:03
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User MNG-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2450L 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 59.8
1-Core 54.6
2-Core 110
45% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 347
34% 276 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 40
Parallax 37.6
30% 38.1 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 27.1
27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MG BG300M8 SSD 360GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1124A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 23 92 13 64 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.2% Poor
Read 249
Write 226
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 60.6
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 1
34% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 41.8
DQ Mixed 0.8
20% 51.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2K70DMB- 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5.1
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback