Today's hottest deals

HP G5420at

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP G5420at  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ABF
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '23 at 08:40
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 102
52% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 188
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8439) 1GB
CLim: 1096 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.30
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.23% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 14
Parallax 11.9
7% 11.7 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 12
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.23%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$48
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 221 222 232 225 230 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.3% Good
Read 232
Write 219
Mixed 204
SusWrite 224
50% 219 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 27.7
92% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 180
139% 190 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 128%
Hs-ssd-e100 256G 256GB
117GB free
Firmware: U0121A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 77 11 10 65 11 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.1% Poor
Read 222
Write 164
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 30.6
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 0.5
30% 8.5 MB/s
DQ Read 52.6
DQ Write 9.9
DQ Mixed 0.5
8% 21 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback