HP 500-119c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics94.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemHP 500-119c  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '23 at 07:02
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4330-$140
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 120
50% 83.4 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 205
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.2% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 135
Parallax 121
95% 124 fps
MRender 94.6
Gravity 128
Splatting 115
93% 113 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S101 1TB
699GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1118A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 253 295 311 307 386 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 333
Write 278
Mixed 254
SusWrite 292
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 16.8
67% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 93.6
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 40.6
59% 107 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
717GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 142 156 162 164 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 141
Write 142
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 157
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 14.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 14.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-119c Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-119c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback