Asrock AM1H-ITX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics7.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock AM1H-ITX  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '23 at 19:28
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5370 APU R3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Memory 35.9
1-Core 31.2
2-Core 50.9
25% 39.3 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 99
14% 101 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Gainward(10B0 0401) 1GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
7.12% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 8.6
7% 9.33 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 9.8
Splatting 8.6
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.12%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
890GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 76
Write 86.6
Mixed 53.5
54% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 71%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
82GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 98.5
Write 22
Mixed 44.9
58% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.3
101% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.1
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 222
18% 222 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1H-ITX Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock AM1H-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback