Dell Precision 7820 Tower

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemDell Precision 7820 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 05WNJ2
Memory49.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230313
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 21 '23 at 14:46
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6142
CPU0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 67.9
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 198
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 788
70% 595 Pts
64-Core 1,853
115% 1,853 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620
Nvidia(10DE 1264) 2GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.25
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 25.1
Parallax 18.4
17% 21.5 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 21
17% 21 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 595 581 588 559 552 564 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 661
Write 616
Mixed 539
SusWrite 573
134% 598 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 43.2
154% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 662
DQ Write 671
DQ Mixed 367
358% 567 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 139%
Great: 296%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
319GB free
Firmware: 033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 404 421 398 372 363 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 438
Write 390
Mixed 314
SusWrite 393
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 41.6
135% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 136
104% 134 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 48.9
MC Mixed 31
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 9.8
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 7820 Tower Builds (Compare 740 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Dell Precision 7820 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback