Lenovo 90BG0021CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90BG0021CF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Bantry CRB
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141217
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 21 '23 at 14:25
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 48.1
1-Core 60.9
2-Core 112
43% 73.8 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 151
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 41.1
Parallax 37.9
30% 38.6 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 27.7
28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0303B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 14 122 64 5.1 193 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 440
Write 325
Mixed 330
SusWrite 87.6
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 20.2
87% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 40.5
79% 159 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-UD3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.4% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 13.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90BG0021CF Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90BG0021CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback