Medion ERAZER P5302 J/C462

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion ERAZER P5302 J/C462  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-EM2
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170105
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 02 '17 at 18:32
Run Duration400 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 86
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 157
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 459
52% 405 Pts
64-Core 540
34% 540 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Sapphire(174B 6438) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2227 MHz, MLim: 2091 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.5
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20% Poor
Lighting 0.53
Reflection 0.38
Parallax 66.4
0% 22.4 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 71.4
58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 20%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
240gb SSD 240GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 477
Write 361
Mixed 378
90% 406 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 3.14
66% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.6
DQ Write 62.1
DQ Mixed 3.17
14% 30 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 93%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 159
Write 124
Mixed 130
104% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 0.24
95% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 84%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
7.57% Terrible
Read 29.4
Write 8.22
Mixed 7.77
15% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.03
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
24% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.57%
Great: 8%
SDHC Card 4GB
1GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Read 20.8
Write 5.95
Mixed 9.39
13% 12 MB/s
4K Read 4.35
4K Write 0.12
4K Mixed 0.15
25% 1.54 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.72%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.4% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 22.8
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 16.3
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback