Lenovo 11363P5

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

14 months ago, 14 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago.

System	Lenovo 11363P5 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200828
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '23 at 09:01
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 469 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	50.9% Above average	Memory 52.9 1-Core 65.7 2-Core 121 46% 79.8 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 453 43% 358 Pts	64-Core 462 29% 462 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 608 User benchmarks, average bench 53% HP(103C 0B0C) ≥ 4GB Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.Q1 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.4% Average	Lighting 64.5 Reflection 62.5 Parallax 102 53% 76.3 fps	MRender 52 Gravity 72.9 Splatting 38.9 43% 54.6 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$45 14,082 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 357 356 355 359 351 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Read 446 Write 348 Mixed 322 SusWrite 353 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 59 4K Mixed 35.2 123% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 260 213% 303 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 128%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB 46,239 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 662GB free Firmware: 056 SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 406 406 404 403 405 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 452 Write 402 Mixed 376 SusWrite 402 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 0.9 61% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 46.6 DQ Mixed 0.9 28% 71.9 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 100%
WD Elements 25A3 3TB 1,766 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 53.5 Write 25.4 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 26.8 40% 32.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1 56% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT8GC72B4NG0N 4x8GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.6% Average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 14.6 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 5.6 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 11363P5 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 11363P5

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v21stBench 57%, 469 samples	6x

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	3x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	3x

SSD
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $45Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	5x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x

RAM
NT8GC72B4NG0N 4x8GBNanyaBench 80%, 38 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 24% - Poor

Total price: $45

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16