Besstar DMAF5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemBesstar DMAF5  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR DMAF5
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200929
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateApr 21 '23 at 08:47
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 160
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 472
45% 371 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.4.1
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
9.91% Terrible
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 17.8
10% 13.9 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 11.8
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.91%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-A01 512GB
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 610 307 482 280 282 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 1,044
Write 1020
Mixed 912
SusWrite 376
188% 838 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 45.8
155% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 631
DQ Write 375
DQ Mixed 524
385% 510 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 135%
Great: 222%
Toshiba MK6459GSXP 640GB
50GB free
Firmware: GN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 38 32 49 51 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 51.4
Write 58.6
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 46.8
32% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD26D4S9S1ME-8 CBD24D4S7S8K1A-8 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 21.8
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 19.4
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DMAF5 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Besstar DMAF5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback