HP Z6 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Z6 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C6
Memory49.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '23 at 00:55
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4210
CPU0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 164
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 624
56% 475 Pts
64-Core 2,081
129% 2,081 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$334
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.2
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 134
Parallax 224
94% 158 fps
MRender 217
Gravity 123
Splatting 181
142% 174 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HALR-000H2 1TB
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA71HAQ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1288 1204 1110 806 694 683 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,767
Write 1,873
Mixed 1,381
SusWrite 964
336% 1,496 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 51
174% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 640
DQ Write 445
DQ Mixed 544
406% 543 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 207%
Great: 321%
Seagate Portable 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 113 114 115 115 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 81.8
Write 96.6
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 112
69% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7CJR4N-WM 4x16GB
4 of 12 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.9% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 10.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z6 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: HP Z6 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback