Asrock FM2A78M-HD+ R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A78M-HD+ R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160315
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 02 '17 at 16:38
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6790K APU (2013 D.Ri)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 129
58% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 204
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 3006) 3GB
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.11.2
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.8% Below average
Lighting 46.8
Reflection 31
Parallax 58.5
38% 45.4 fps
MRender 29.8
Gravity 45.5
Splatting 38.3
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.Y Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 505
Write 474
Mixed 493
110% 491 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 13.4
99% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 27
DQ Write 62.4
DQ Mixed 11.6
18% 33.7 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
688GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 166
Mixed 147
118% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.2
90% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 107%
WD 5000AAD External 500GB
386GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 34.1
Write 30.2
Mixed 15.3
32% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.19
62% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 21%
WD Elements 2TB
509GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.9% Poor
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.9
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A78M-HD+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A78M-HD+ R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $144
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback