Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory56 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20171229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '23 at 12:31
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 241
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 931
81% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,289
80% 1,289 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 144
Parallax 133
106% 136 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 138
Splatting 119
102% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 797 725 677 635 591 558 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,509
Write 884
Mixed 744
SusWrite 664
211% 950 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 48
170% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 868
DQ Write 703
DQ Mixed 801
595% 791 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 188%
Great: 363%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 111 104 104 106 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 53.3
Write 94.7
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 106
58% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.5
191% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 51
MC Mixed 29
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 9.8
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,148
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback