Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	15.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	5.98GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5.98GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 1,709 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	39.9% Below average	Memory 56.5 1-Core 56.5 2-Core 103 43% 72 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 99.4 17% 122 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GRID M60-8Q 94 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1150) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.95 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Lighting 22.2 Reflection 25.6 Parallax 20.8 18% 22.9 fps	MRender 31.7 Gravity 22.2 Splatting 28.8 23% 27.6 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 20%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Xensrc PVDISK 538GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 408GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15.9% Very poor	Read 178 Write 105 Mixed 99.1 28% 128 MB/s	4K Read 2.23 4K Write 2.98 4K Mixed 2.04 8% 2.42 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x5GB 177 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1 of 1 slots used 5GB DIMM RAM Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	36.1% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 13.3 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 126%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 55%

Gunboat

CPU
Xeon E5-2623 v4IntelBench 59%, 42 samples	16x
Xeon Gold 5315YIntelBench 71%, 25 samples	14x
Xeon Silver 4215RIntelBench 62%, 17 samples	13x

GPU
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	9x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples	7x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples	6x

SSD
PVDISK 268GBXensrcBench 53%, 95 samples	53x
PVDISK 2TBXensrcBench 50%, 16 samples	5x
Virtual Disk 107GBMicrosoftBench 60%, 85 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16