Asus Z170I PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170I PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160215
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 15:25
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 94.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 253
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 364
49% 363 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Lighting 105
Reflection 84.8
Parallax 51.4
85% 80.3 fps
MRender 86.9
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 65.1
60% 75.1 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
843GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 36 36 40 40 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 3,181
Write 29.2
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 37.7
172% 826 MB/s
4K Read 295
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 5.2
455% 101 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 250%
Great: 441%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
110GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 165 161 169 172 185 MB/s
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.4% Average
Read 281
Write 130
Mixed 117
SusWrite 168
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 7.1
67% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 78.6
92% 160 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 78%
SSD 1TB 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: V8442c31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 271 264 290 294 294 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.2% Above average
Read 191
Write 157
Mixed 199
SusWrite 276
47% 206 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 28.5
86% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 171
127% 166 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 259%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB
379GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 36 38 38 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 54.7
Write 27.4
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 37.2
46% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 19%
WD Elements 1TB
147GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 30 31 32 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 52.6
Write 25.6
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 31.2
40% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
34% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2829 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 24.9
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 25.5
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170I PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170I PRO GAMING - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $761
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback