Notebook P17SM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNotebook P17SM  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P17SM
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 11:36
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 142
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 338
30% 256 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M
Clevo(1558 7104) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 24
15% 20.6 fps
MRender 22.4
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 18.5
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 218 180 202 213 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 413
Write 179
Mixed 130
SusWrite 193
50% 229 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 19.6
86% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 55.8
88% 175 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-053.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
25.1% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 5.5
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P17SM Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook P17SM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback