Clevo P15xEMx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemClevo P15xEMx  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO P15xEMx
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '17 at 12:42
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 74.3
1-Core 41.7
2-Core 83.3
44% 66.4 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 207
22% 179 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Clevo(1558 5105) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.71% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 2.78
3% 4.08 fps
MRender 5.62
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.7
4% 5.19 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.71%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPC256HBGJ-00000 256GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM1201Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.2% Above average
Read 259
Write 242
Mixed 210
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 18.9
66% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 74.5
DQ Mixed 51.1
52% 85.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 75%
Toshiba MK3276GSX 320GB-$12
202GB free
Firmware: GS001A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 46.7
Write 45.4
Mixed 8.46
24% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.32
76% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 18
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.4
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P15xEMx Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo P15xEMx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $504
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback