Supermicro C9X299-PGF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro C9X299-PGF  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C9X299-RPGF
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 08:05
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon (Cascadelake)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 61.2
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 210
63% 118 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 945
76% 667 Pts
64-Core 959
59% 959 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37AB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 178
Parallax 207
93% 166 fps
MRender 214
Gravity 194
Splatting 153
150% 187 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 110%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
89GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 499 460 553 684 675 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 51% Great: 70%
Red Hat VirtIO 537GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,187
Write 1,103
Mixed 1091
848% 1,127 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 42.3
7,335% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 523
DQ Write 500
DQ Mixed 238
2,995% 420 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 50.4
MC Mixed 31.9
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 9
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C9X299-PGF Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO

System: Supermicro C9X299-PGF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,538
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback