MSI MS-17E5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics74.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GL75 9SE
MotherboardMSI MS-17E5  (all builds)
Memory15.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 07:39
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 193
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 319
37% 289 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 129A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.7% Very good
Lighting 89.5
Reflection 96.8
Parallax 91.3
73% 92.5 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 81.5
Splatting 82.2
78% 97.8 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv512g TOSHIBA 512GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADXA0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 266 228 298 218 205 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 766
Write 82.5
Mixed 387
SusWrite 266
82% 376 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 30.4
116% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 688
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 450
350% 489 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 166%
Adata SU630 480GB
402GB free
Firmware: V8X02c08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 355 355 372 377 376 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 397
Write 367
Mixed 336
SusWrite 357
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 28
95% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 196
152% 206 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C15S4/16G Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
71.5% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 21.7
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 14.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17E5 Builds (Compare 615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17E5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback