Lenovo 20KSA017CD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20KSA017CD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20KSA017CD
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 06:04
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 49
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 100
41% 69.8 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 153
19% 145 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 5069) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9749
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.14% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 6.4
5% 7.97 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.14%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 108 72 63 62 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
42% Average
Read 286
Write 202
Mixed 309
SusWrite 61.8
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 16.5
61% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 45.4
71% 135 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42%
Great: 100%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1TB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 6.6 6.5 6.5 6.5 8.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.62% Terrible
Read 5.7
Write 5.7
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 7.9
8% 6.12 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 2.62%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-013.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 19.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 15
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20KSA017CD Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20KSA017CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback