HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 01:19
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 189
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 423
46% 364 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Asus(1043 83B0) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
3.7% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 2.4
4% 4.37 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 3.8
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.7%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM871 2.5 7mm 256GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMM02D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 310 305 315 311 305 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 470
Write 405
Mixed 314
SusWrite 310
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 32.8
107% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 324
249% 337 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
220GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 124 123 127 128 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 173
Write 31.3
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 125
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback