HP ProBook 470 G4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProBook 470 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8234
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '23 at 19:04
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 168
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 243
30% 232 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 8234) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.66% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 6.5
5% 6.97 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 6
Splatting 9.2
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.66%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E256 256GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 421
Write 369
Mixed 356
85% 382 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 37.2
114% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 125
145% 250 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 105%
Toshiba HDWL120 2TB
994GB free
Firmware: JT000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 128 127 128 130 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 130
Write 121
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 127
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.6
231% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3H1 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 19.6
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 18.5
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 470 G4 Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 470 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback