Lenovo 3492C4G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 3492C4G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '23 at 18:51
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 108
52% 82.3 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 216
24% 191 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.7% Below average
Lighting 40.5
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 38.2
33% 39.7 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 33.3
29% 36 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 67 37 31 42 17 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.3% Poor
Read 170
Write 179
Mixed 169
SusWrite 54.6
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 10.3
37% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 59.5
DQ Mixed 32.2
37% 65.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 56%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
49GB free
Firmware: 10.02E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 27 24 22 21 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 15.7
Write 29
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 24
16% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264AZ-1G4M1 0443 RMR1870EC58E9F1333 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3492C4G Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3492C4G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback