HP EliteBook 845 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 845 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8760
Memory52.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221017
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateApr 18 '23 at 11:57
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 63.4
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 137
54% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 784
73% 607 Pts
64-Core 1,121
69% 1,121 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 8760) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.16.03
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
8.79% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 14.4
Parallax 24.2
6% 15.3 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 20.1
Splatting 18.1
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.79%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
773GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 965 990 988 1093 1157 1181 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1190
Write 971
Mixed 1,089
SusWrite 1,062
243% 1,078 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 41.6
133% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 542
DQ Write 554
DQ Mixed 813
538% 636 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 178%
Great: 477%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9E02] CMSX64GX4M2A3200C22 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.3% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 24.1
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 17.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 845 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP EliteBook 845 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback