MSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory18.2 GB free of 28 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150320
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 17 '23 at 13:55
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 86.3
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 198
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 676
67% 549 Pts
64-Core 928
57% 928 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Asus(1043 8548) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.7% Average
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 59.7
49% 59.7 fps
MRender 59.7
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 59.7
49% 59.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 138 131 123 126 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 473
Write 280
Mixed 318
SusWrite 138
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 37.2
123% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 326
248% 334 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
124GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 228 232 235 192 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 462
Mixed 374
SusWrite 193
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 45.2
146% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 260
213% 303 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 126%
Crucial BX100 1TB-$500
55GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 227 229 235 265 252 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 483
Write 422
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 238
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 35.7
104% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 205
175% 255 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
160GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 249 253 255 266 301 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 456
Mixed 409
SusWrite 264
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 44.1
147% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 351
259% 339 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$224
274GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 228 232 227 241 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 452
Mixed 406
SusWrite 244
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 48
154% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 338
254% 337 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 162 164 164 176 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 149
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 165
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
105% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7x4GB
7 of 8 slots used
28GB DIMM 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (92nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 37.5
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 22.3
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 99%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885) Builds (Compare 1,550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback