Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory	384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 414 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Memory 55.5 1-Core 77.8 2-Core 154 54% 95.8 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 621 55% 465 Pts	64-Core 2,760 171% 2,760 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel RS3DC080 5TB 396GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.65 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 1.2TB-$1,000 994 User benchmarks, average bench 202% 55GB free Firmware: 8EV10171 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	152% Outstanding	Read 918 Write 1,001 Mixed 869 208% 929 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 78.1 4K Mixed 37.5 132% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 306 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 140 149% 246 MB/s
Poor: 124% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 250%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 24x16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 24 of 24 slots used 384GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	86.5% Excellent	MC Read 47.6 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 32.1 101% 35.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 11.7 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 65%

Battle cruiser

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 v31stBench 75%, 437 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro M6000NvidiaBench 73%, 640 samples	1x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	1x

SSD
SSDSC2BA012T4 1TBIntelBench 91%, 85 samples	1x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	1x

RAM
9ASF51272PZ-2G1B1 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 9ASF51272PZ-2G1B1 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 9ASF51272PZ-2G1B1 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 9ASF51272PZ-2G1B1 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 9ASF51272PZ-2G1B1 18ASF1... 96GBMicronBench 98%, 2 samples	1x
9ASF51272PZ-2G1B1 24x4GBMicronBench 75%, 1 sample	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16