HP ProLiant ML310e Gen8 v2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProLiant ML310e Gen8 v2  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190404
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '23 at 12:02
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3-$203
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 141
53% 90.5 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 462
44% 365 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 186 200 195 186 184 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61% Good
Read 154
Write 200
Mixed 172
SusWrite 190
41% 179 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 38.6
130% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 39
DQ Write 87.1
DQ Mixed 52.7
43% 59.6 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 61%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 669238-071 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 15.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML310e Gen8 v2 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: HP ProLiant ML310e Gen8 v2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback