Asus ROG STRIX X370-I GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

13 months ago, 13 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-I GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220428
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '23 at 11:54
Run Duration	347 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Memory 81 1-Core 104 2-Core 199 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 407 8-Core 713 68% 560 Pts	64-Core 1,051 65% 1,051 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (65 fps cap detected)	52.2% Above average	Lighting 64.3 Reflection 65.5 Parallax 60.5 52% 63.4 fps	MRender 65.8 Gravity 64.9 Splatting 60.7 52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 335GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 474 477 480 479 479 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 394 Mixed 394 SusWrite 464 98% 437 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 83.3 4K Mixed 53.3 173% 58.8 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 363 273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 315 307 305 305 254 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 482 Mixed 459 SusWrite 300 98% 437 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 85 4K Mixed 53 175% 59.6 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 363 273% 366 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 407GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 473 477 480 479 479 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 483 Mixed 405 SusWrite 464 104% 460 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 87.4 4K Mixed 54.8 179% 61.2 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 362 273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1TB free Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1207 1225 1225 1229 1218 1232 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	232% Outstanding	Read 1,337 Write 1233 Mixed 1,238 SusWrite 1,223 283% 1,258 MB/s	4K Read 52.7 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 67.7 222% 74.7 MB/s	DQ Read 847 DQ Write 740 DQ Mixed 787 592% 791 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 232% Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1.5TB free Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2355 2362 2346 2350 2360 2338 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	336% Outstanding	Read 2,067 Write 2,396 Mixed 1,901 SusWrite 2,352 493% 2,179 MB/s	4K Read 56.1 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 76.5 242% 81 MB/s	DQ Read 834 DQ Write 682 DQ Mixed 782 579% 766 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 336% Great: 435%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 3TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 28 29 29 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 53 Write 30.1 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 28.5 44% 34.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1 78% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 46%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 85GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 53.6 Write 29.5 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 3.6 33% 28.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1 77% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 40.9 MC Write 37.4 MC Mixed 31.9 105% 36.7 GB/s	SC Read 25.7 SC Write 35.1 SC Mixed 27.5 84% 29.4 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-I GAMING Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 55%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-I GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	13x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	11x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	7x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	5x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	5x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	6x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $87Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 45,582 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	3x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $393

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16