Asus H61M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H61M-C  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140314
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 16 '23 at 04:02
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340-$278
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 160
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 320
41% 312 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 379B) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.30
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.13% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 7.9
5% 6.37 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 7
5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.13%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S650 240GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12155
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 123 29 30 31 30 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.7% Above average
Read 251
Write 237
Mixed 239
SusWrite 77.8
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 30.6
103% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 184
130% 163 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 103%
Toshiba MK3256GSY 320GB-$90
83GB free
Firmware: LH013C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 49 47 49 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 82.6
Write 77.7
Mixed 31
SusWrite 46.7
43% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-C Builds (Compare 762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-C - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $192
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback