Hp-pavilion AW017AV-ABA e9200z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion AW017AV-ABA e9200z  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN ALOE
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '23 at 18:51
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 620
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 52.6
1-Core 38.5
2-Core 74.6
35% 55.2 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 124
16% 121 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
MSI(1462 1603) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 2
3% 3.6 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 5.1
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM04B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 81 90 88 95 95 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.9% Poor
Read 161
Write 164
Mixed 122
SusWrite 87.2
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 12.2
43% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 27.2
DQ Write 53.1
DQ Mixed 30.7
26% 37 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
2TB free
Firmware: CC95
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 87 90 89 95 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 174
Write 26.5
Mixed 62
SusWrite 89.7
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 61%
ST316081 5AS 160GB
148GB free, PID 070c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 56.7
Write 14.4
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 22.7
33% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
30% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 18%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-60ZCT1 320GB
274GB free, PID 110c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 22 23 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 50.2
Write 22.4
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 22.4
34% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
29% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 20%
WD 2002FAE External 2TB
486GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 0.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.6
1% 0.52 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Mixed 0
168% 15.1 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 16GB
1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
17% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 17%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AW017AV-ABA e9200z Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion AW017AV-ABA e9200z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $129
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback