HP 24-b102la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemHP 24-b102la  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81B9
Memory0.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 15 '23 at 18:47
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9210 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
22% Poor
Memory 35.6
1-Core 31.9
2-Core 39.8
24% 35.8 Pts
4-Core 50.6
8-Core 52.6
7% 51.6 Pts
64-Core 35.4
2% 35.4 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
HP(103C 81B9) 384MB
Ram: 384MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
2.63% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 4.2
2% 3.67 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 5.6
4% 4.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.63%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 42 44 138 141 166 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 108
Write 148
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 107
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 114%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
14GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 14.9
Write 2.7
7% 8.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
18% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA425S6AFR6N-TF HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 6GB
2133, 2133 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 5.4
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 224
18% 224 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback