Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4712MQ 5,324 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	29.2% Poor	Memory 44.5 1-Core 38 2-Core 44.3 28% 42.3 Pts	4-Core 78.1 8-Core 104 12% 91.1 Pts	64-Core 105 6% 105 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1B0A 2109) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.58% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 0.9 0% 1.27 fps	MRender 1.2 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.1 1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.58% Great: 3%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,810 Write 8.5 Mixed 14.4 437% 611 MB/s	4K Read 230 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.9 9,713% 77.3 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
SD Card 1GB 755 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 9.9 Write 3.2 Mixed 4.7 6% 5.93 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 13% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP687515-H66-MCN 12GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 9.9 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 7 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 183 22% 183 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	20x
GeForce 840MNvidiaBench 9%, 20,978 samples	5x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	3x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $27Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	4x
Extreme II 480GBSanDisk $192Bench 92%, 1,439 samples	3x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	2x

RAM
Team-Elite-1333 2x4GBTeamBench 46%, 1,089 samples	6x
CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GBCrucialBench 26%, 4,731 samples	4x
CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 12GBUnknownBench 35%, 20 samples	4x

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $27