Toshiba Satellite L775D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite L775D  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON TKBSS
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '23 at 08:25
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3400M APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
20.1% Poor
Memory 30.5
1-Core 19
2-Core 38.3
19% 29.3 Pts
4-Core 54.7
8-Core 67.6
8% 61.2 Pts
64-Core 72.3
4% 72.3 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6520G
Toshiba(1179 FC62) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
2.31% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 2.5
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.6
2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.31%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JE3OA60B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 66.3
Write 49.4
Mixed 27.3
35% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 50%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 8GB
3GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 16.3
Write 0.7
Mixed 4.7
6% 7.23 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
20.9% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.4
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.9
7% 2.57 GB/s
Latency 251
16% 251 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L775D Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L775D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback