Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 4,124 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Memory 82.4 1-Core 22.3 2-Core 39.7 37% 48.1 Pts	4-Core 72.7 8-Core 117 12% 94.6 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics P630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 224D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.04% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 9.7 Parallax 2.4 2% 4.8 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2 Splatting 3.4 2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.04% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 421GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 733 830 754 560 535 573 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 809 Write 1,557 Mixed 736 SusWrite 664 213% 942 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 30.9 4K Mixed 15.6 65% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 92.2 DQ Mixed 93 73% 102 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 296%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS7AFR8N-UH 4x16GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	44.6% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 18.5 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 8 22% 7.6 GB/s	Latency 76.1 52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E3-1505M v6IntelBench 70%, 4,124 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics P630IntelBench 5%, 3,370 samples	1x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	1x

RAM
HMA82GS7AFR8N-UH 4x16GBHynixBench 75%, 69 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16