| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 42.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-E/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161227 |
| Uptime | 5.3 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 15 '23 at 01:13 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
54.5%
Above average
|
69% 123 Pts
|
30% 222 Pts
|
16% 254 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
EVGA(3842 0783) 3GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.9%
Average
|
43% 57.8 fps
|
43% 55.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mushkin ECO2 240GB-$109
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 609ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 73 43 86 66 MB/s
|
53.9%
Above average
|
42% 186 MB/s
|
107% 43 MB/s
|
135% 184 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
911GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 174 177 161 182 191 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
115% 157 MB/s
|
216% 1.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.3%
Below average
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
14% 4.77 GB/s
|
40% 101 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,423 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $84Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 215x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 189x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $40Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 168x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 176x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 171x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 109x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $171 |