Asus G751JT

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus G751JT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G751JT
Memory	28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151102
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '17 at 20:18
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	97%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4720HQ 80,960 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 103 2-Core 190 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 508 48% 399 Pts	64-Core 522 32% 522 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M 6,247 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Asus(1043 22DA) 3GB CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22.1% Poor	Lighting 24.9 Reflection 28.8 Parallax 23.3 20% 25.7 fps	MRender 35.6 Gravity 24.9 Splatting 32.5 25% 31 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 501 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 188 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 49 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7580464101	89.7% Excellent	Read 508 Write 397 Mixed 405 97% 437 MB/s	4K Read 39.8 4K Write 71.6 4K Mixed 26.5 132% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 41.2 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 24.6 51% 97.1 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 83GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1976 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 408 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 45 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 49 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16713043334	73.9% Very good	Read 267 Write 207 Mixed 217 51% 230 MB/s	4K Read 35.6 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 39.5 138% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 77.2 85% 143 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 134%
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 25GB free Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2263 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 975 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 226 (C2) HDA temperature 71 48 223339479069 (F1) Unknown 100 100 61328	47.2% Average	Read 262 Write 178 Mixed 185 46% 208 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 9.26 67% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 193 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 8.12 44% 103 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 95%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB 316 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 13GB free, PID 0747 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 45.2 Write 26.3 Mixed 23 36% 31.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.75 4K Write 0.93 4K Mixed 0.74 78% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-123.A00LF Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 9905428-123.A00LF Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 32GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 16.3 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 19.7 50% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G751JT Builds (Compare 635 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Asus G751JT

CPU
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	372x
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	210x
Core i7-4750HQIntelBench 63%, 5,497 samples	51x

GPU
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	469x
GeForce GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 6,247 samples	165x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	1x

SSD
X300s Non-Secure 256GBSanDiskBench 82%, 2,451 samples	60x
X300s Non-Secure 128GBSanDiskBench 75%, 1,499 samples	50x
SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $223Bench 175%, 7,621 samples	17x

RAM
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	122x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	106x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	61x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16