Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH570
Memory52.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210806
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 14 '23 at 21:22
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 50.1
1-Core 150
2-Core 288
83% 163 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 863
86% 700 Pts
64-Core 1,147
71% 1,147 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 2018) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3141
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 160
Parallax 139
120% 149 fps
MRender 166
Gravity 111
Splatting 111
103% 129 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 112%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
485GB free
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1130 1686 2084 2241 916 470 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,252
Write 2,230
Mixed 1,794
SusWrite 1,421
432% 1,924 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 43.5
163% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 982
DQ Write 770
DQ Mixed 889
662% 880 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 266%
Great: 633%
Nvme CA6-8D1024 1TB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERA0901 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 963 510 558 430 532 408 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,533
Write 2,168
Mixed 1,002
SusWrite 567
296% 1,317 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 43
129% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 959
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 823
561% 704 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 165%
Great: 427%
WD Game Drive 5TB
3.5TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 97 104 105 106 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 125
Write 107
Mixed 59
SusWrite 102
129% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
173% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY Inc M4S32S682LJJJ43-12 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 26.4
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 15.3
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409 Builds (Compare 1,445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback